Faith and Fanaticism
Google Image |
A BBC
reporter recently interviewed a woman in England who defended the brutal and
lethal methods of radical Islamic groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS, which appear
to favor mass killings and beheadings in their attempts to conquer parts Iraq
and Syria.
When the
reporter asked the woman, who had been accused of promoting terrorism in Great
Britain, how she could justify breaking British law, she replied that she must
obey God’s law rather than civil law. She seemed to apply that principle to the
Middle East killings as well.
It
reminded me of the passage from the Acts of the Apostles in the Christian Bible
in which Peter and some other apostles were hauled before the Jewish Supreme
Council in Jerusalem. Council members berated the apostles for preaching about
Jesus after the Council had forbidden them to do so.
“Didn’t
we give you strict orders not to teach in Jesus’ name?” the chief priest asked
the apostles. Peter answered, “It’s necessary to obey God rather than men.”
Christians
would likely classify the woman in Britain and the terrorists in Paris as
fanatics, but not Peter and the apostles. There appears to be a fine line,
however, between religious fervor and fanaticism, so what’s the difference?
The
dictionary defines a fanatic as a person “marked by excessive enthusiasm and
often intense uncritical devotion.”
The part
about “excessive enthusiasm” is hard to deal with because “excessive” is
subjective. I’ve noticed that in some Spanish-speaking countries, the name for "soccer
fan" is “fanatico.” So fans are expected to be fanatics when it comes to their
sport. Should religious people be any less enthusiastic about their faith?
It’s the
second part of that definition that, I believe, is key here, especially the
word “uncritical.”
The
woman in Britain acknowledged to the reporter, who was evidently a Muslim
herself and well-versed in the Quran, that she had not actually studied the
Quran nor Islamic theology, but that “wise mullahs,” whom she respects, had and
she had adopted their views.
Google Image |
In other
words, the woman had not done her homework, and that, in my view is what
principally separates religious people from fanatics. Most religions, though
steeped in mystery and subject to doubt, are rational. They require
thoughtfulness and critical thinking. And although I haven’t read much of the
Quran, no religion that I know promotes violence.
A few believers do, of course, and appear to be determined to impose their views
on others.
If you’re
thinking primarily of Islam, however, here’s what one Muslim leader recently
had to say on the subject during a recent interview on Fox News.
Ahmadiyya Muslim Community USA Spokesperson Qasim Rashid condemned the
attack in Paris and refuted the notion that Islam is inherently violent.
"This is not an Islamic act of terror," he said; "this is just an act of terror done by people claiming to ascribe to Islam. When we study Islam, we see clearly that the Quran condemns this kind of violence categorically. That Prophet Muhammad said that a Muslim is one from whom all others are safe.”
Why, then, asked the interviewer, do “these Islamic extremists, these terrorists use the Quran as justification for committing these kinds of violent acts?”
Answered Rashid: “Well, it's the same reason why any extremist group uses scripture. There's no shortage of extremists in everything. Let's not forget the Lord's Resistance Army, a Ugandan terrorist group that claims to be Christian. And I would vehemently argue against anyone who would blame the Bible, or Jesus Christ, for their acts of terrorism.
“This is not about religion,” he said. “This is about political power, this is about uneducated, ignorant youth who are being manipulated by clerics and extremists. And this is why it's all the more important for us, as the moderates, regardless of faith, to stay united and combat this.”
Besides Rashid, the French Muslim Council, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the Arab League, and Al-Azhar, a 1,000-year-old seat of religious learning respected by Muslims around the world, issued statements condemning the Paris attacks.
People searching for God have sufficient struggles with faith, and have sufficient doubts about religion, without having to deal with the question of whether religion is inherently violent. Despite the few who want to impose their “faith” on others by force, the vast majority of religions are rational and teach love and peace, and the vast majority of religious people are rational, loving and peaceful.
Comments
Post a Comment