The “Cities” Within
Google Image |
Science is about evidence. It confirms realities for
which evidence can be found. If there is no evidence, it doesn’t mean the
reality doesn’t exist. It means there is no testable evidence to support it.
That’s why science is not competent to determine whether there is a God, even
though many scientists believe it’s their duty as scientists to debunk the
notion of God.
On the other side, many religious people shun science
because they think its anti-God, even though if they followed their own
principle, by which God is creator of everything – including science – they would
draw another conclusion. Indeed, science helps us know God by knowing his
creation. And it gives us insights into reality by surprising us with its
discoveries.
Since I read “Life On Man,” the 1969 book by
bacteriologist Theodor Rosebury about the microbes that inhabit us, I’ve been fascinated
by the subject. Recently, I heard microbiologist Rob Knight in a TED talk that
renewed my fascination and caused me to reflect on the hidden worlds that are
as foreign to us as any science fiction character you could imagine.
It turns out that humans, as well as other animals, have within
them huge communities of microbes – what I like to think of as “cities” – that
perform various functions according to their location.
“…Microbes in the
gut determine whether painkillers are toxic to your liver, or if a certain type
of medication will work for heart disease. Our microbes help us digest food,
they shape our immune system, and some evidence suggests that they might even
affect our behavior,” says Knight.
There is, said Knight, the oral microbial community – the
main subject of Rosebury’s book – the skin community, the vaginal community,
and the fecal community. “The different regions of the body have very different
microbes. Microbes from one person’s gut and mouth can be as different as what
you find in the coral reef and the desert prairie.”
And proportionally, they may be farther apart than L.A. and
New York. “A few feet in your human body makes more difference than
hundreds of miles on earth.”
“Human beings share 99.9 percent of DNA in common,” he
says. “But two people might only have about 10 percent overlap in
their microbes.” The human body has 10 trillion human cells and 100 trillion microbial
cells; 20,000 human genes and 2-20 million microbial genes.
Makes Shanghai and Karachi, to say nothing of New York,
seem like hamlets.
“The three pounds of microbes that you carry around with
you might be more important than every single gene you carry around in your
genome,” he says. Microbes have been linked to heart disease, colon cancer
and obesity in human beings and, in mice, to multiple sclerosis, depression and
autism.
Elizabeth Johnson Google Image |
All this brings to mind Elizabeth Johnson’s book, “Ask
the Beasts: Darwin and the God of Love,” in which she describes the 19th
century opposition to Darwin’s discoveries and theory of evolution. Although
there was opposition from religious leaders at the time of the publication of
the Origin of Species in 1859, it paled compared to the opposition from
scientists.
What Darwin proposed and demonstrated was inconceivable
to most scientists of the day, who were convinced that species were created
individually. It just shows you that religious leaders have no monopoly on
dogmatism. Now evolution – at least for many of us – is a given. But it doesn’t
diminish the wonder we may feel about discoveries such as the microbe
communities within us. Which of us could be aware that we’re walking around
like “countries,” with many “cities” within?
Science amazes us with its discoveries, each seemingly
more fantastic than could be imagined. The size and dimensions of the universe
and the discovery and theories related to quantum mechanics are other examples.
They show us that a whole other dimension in life, including the spiritual, is
possible.
For many of us, it’s hard to believe that there is a God. He/she
is unseen, it is said, but is in and around us. For many, it’s even more
incredible that such a God would care anything about us. “Highly implausible,”
we might say.
But
is it any more implausible than the notion that our bodies contain these
immense microbial cities, each of which have such an important role to play in
our well-being? Is it any more implausible than what quantum physics says, that
it’s theoretically possible for an object to be in two places at once? Is it
any more implausible than the fact that each of us – physically and in relation
to the universe – is less significant than a grain of sand on the beach?
The
fact that we live our daily lives unaware of these weird discoveries doesn’t debunk
their existence nor diminish their significance, just as God’s presence in the
world, despite being hidden from view, shouldn’t lead us to debunk God’s existence
nor minimize its importance.
None
of this reduces the need to accept uncertainty as a part of faith, of course. Because science isn't competent to measure the unmeasurable,
God’s existence isn't a scientific fact, but a fact based on faith.
So it’s a package deal. Faith is rational, but doubt is part of faith. Science is also rational, but its purview doesn’t extend to all of reality.
So it’s a package deal. Faith is rational, but doubt is part of faith. Science is also rational, but its purview doesn’t extend to all of reality.
Comments
Post a Comment