Fleetwood Mac a “religious experience?”
Google Image |
Colored strobe lights were continually
swinging around the inside of the giant Pepsi Center arena in Denver. For many,
there was no need to pay for a seat since they were on their feet for the
whole concert. Many were dancing and swaying. What was obvious was that the
performers had the audience’s undivided attention for the couple of hours they
were onstage.
The whole thing appeared to me to be a sort of religious experience,
and I couldn’t help comparing it to “church.” Some of the contemporary mega
churches may attempt to mimic concert-like experiences, but most church-goers
would see little comparison to what they experience at church and the kind of
emotional absorption and sheer joy I witnessed at the concert.
The reality is, of course, that the experiences are, and should be, very different. What people seek in such a concert isn’t what they seek from going to church. In a blog last year, I quoted Rachel Held Evans, a young evangelical Christian who writes a popular blog on faith and gives presentations around the country. In a blog for CNN entitled, “Why Millennials are Leaving the Church,” she wrote:
“Invariably, after I’ve finished my presentation and opened the floor to questions, a pastor raises his hand and says, ‘So what you’re saying is we need hipper worship bands ….’
“Time and again, the assumption among Christian leaders, and evangelical leaders in particular, is that the key to drawing twenty-somethings back to church is simply to make a few style updates – edgier music, more casual services, a coffee shop in the fellowship hall, a pastor who wears skinny jeans, an updated Web site that includes online giving.”
That isn’t what Millennials have in mind, she wrote.
“…We want to be challenged to live lives of holiness, not only when it comes to sex, but also when it comes to living simply, caring for the poor and oppressed, pursuing reconciliation, engaging in creation care and becoming peacemakers. You can’t hand us a latte and then go about business as usual and expect us to stick around. We’re not leaving the church because we don’t find the cool factor there; we’re leaving the church because we don’t find Jesus there.”
Rachel Held Evans Google Image |
This
desire isn’t limited to Millennials. “Religion” means to connect, and all searchers
for God are looking for a connection to God and, acknowledged or not, to each
other.
I’ve
written several blogs about the popular notion of “spirituality without
religion,” an idea that, given the image of religion today, may be understandable.
To many,
religion is the aggregate for a group of institutions, all of which appear to
offer “salvation.” In many people’s eyes, however, these institutions are more
interested in self-preservation and self-aggrandizement than in actual people
with actual lives. Part of the rub is that, like any business or secular
organization, they have rules, organizational charts and chains of command, and
for some reason, religions aren’t supposed to be so organized.
Some
refer to religion as “Pablum.” For those unfamiliar with the term, it’s a kind
of baby cereal - something like oatmeal – which Wikipedia says implies something
that is “bland, mushy, unappetizing, or infantile.” What’s more, the theology and practices of some
religions fly in the face of contemporary notions of fairness and equality.
Some appear to offer nothing “original,” or appear to have nothing to offer at
all.
Although
I understand these observations, I really think part of the problem is – for
lack of a better term – cultural. Most of the world’s great religions are
ancient, and we’re caught up in the present and “the next big thing.” We can’t
get beyond the confines of time and space and we have to contend with so
many distractions plus our own lethargy. And the great controversies of our
time seem much more important than the historic questions about the existence
and nature of the transcendent.
Spirituality
may be a good idea, but for many, it remains a vague yearning. We may pursue it
in spurts, but a sustained pursuit of a spiritual life on one’s own eludes most
people. Without religion, it often becomes more about “me.”
That
brings us back to relationships, something humans know a lot about. If you
don’t believe in its importance, talk to prisoners who have suffered long
periods of solitary confinement. All theist religions boil down to
relationships. The charge in the Hebrew Bible, repeated by Jesus in the
Christian Bible, to “love God and neighbor,” is not only a universal
commandment but a universal human longing.
William
O’Malley, a Jesuit priest who teaches religion at Fordham Preparatory School in
New York City, wrote in an article in America magazine in which he tried to
shed light on what he believes is true spirituality, which depends on religion just as religion depends on it.
“Spirituality
is, as Viktor Frankl put it, ‘man’s search for meaning.’ We are the only
species whose choices are not branded into the fibers of our natures. We must
choose to be who we are. But first we must discern what human beings are for.
And we have only two backgrounds against which to measure our worth. Our lives
are either speckles of light against infinite darkness or smudges of gray
within infinite Light. We are here to discover our shining (see Gospel of
Mathew 5:14).
“Liturgies”
he goes on, “that make the community as important as its Host miss a crucial
truth … we are connected into an Inexhaustible Energy whose infusion ought to
make us recognizably more alive the rest of the week than those who ignore
Him/Her/Them.”
The
Fleetwood Mac audience were wildly enthusiastic, but afterward many piled into their
cars, Ubers and taxis to return to lives of self-imposed isolation from God and
each other. Spirituality, within the context of religion, makes and preserves
the connections that are vital to human beings.
Comments
Post a Comment