Gratitude to Whom or What?
Google Image |
There’s
no evidence that they wonder how the feed got there. They just eat it.
Despite
all the scientific progress of the last century or so, there are still a lot of
things in our lives like that. We don’t have adequate explanations about how
people and things got where they are or why, nor do we reflect much on the
explanations we have. Sometimes when I drink a glass of water, or use “nature’s
solvent” to clean something, I think of the wonders of H2O, but usually I just
drink it or use it.
Occasionally,
however, I ask myself, “Why does water, which happens to be so essential to
life – including my own life – exist?”
According to the Hub Pages web site, “…There
is no other substance or molecule in the universe capable of interacting with
as many of the elements in the periodic table as water to produce hundreds or
even thousands of chemicals for life to exist. This is why water is essential.”
A radical oversimplification on a Wikipedia
entry on water’s origin: It exists “due to planetary cooling.”
Scientists
can tell you a lot about the formation of water, in fact, and speculate about
its origins in the universe. They may be able to tell you the “how” of water,
however, but not the “why" (although they may believe they are the same). That’s true of the universe and all of reality. Why
something? Why not nothing?
Many
scientists undoubtedly reject such questions, attempting to limit speculation
about reality to things and theories that can be measured and tested. And I’m
all for science’s attempts to use these tools to learn more about reality. But
skeptics who are sincere in a search for God still have to think, to speculate,
to ask the “why” questions.
James Schall, S.J. in an essay called, “Why Do
Things Exist,” reflecting on Josef Pieper’s “For Love of Wisdom,” (http://www.ignatiusinsight.com/features2007/schall_existence_sept07.asp) wrote:
“We have lively minds. They are, as Aristotle said,
capable of knowing all that exists. Indeed, they seek to know all that exists
and are uneasy if they do not. More especially, we want to know why all that
exists does
exist. …On the plain of existence, we arrive already having been given what we
are. We wonder, ‘Why?’
Google Image |
Some people, of course, are perfectly happy never
wondering about such things. Schall wrote that his reflections on existence “were
caused by an e-mail, which I received the other day. A young man, evidently a
teacher … observed that ‘for the majority of my students the existence of
things is almost irrelevant; for them everything is how you choose to think
about it.’
“For me,” writes Schall, “the existence
of things is the most relevant fact about the things we daily encounter. Then I
began to notice that about half the people that I meet walking across campus
have an i-Pod or some similar contraption in their ears. When you pass them,
they do not hear you unless you are loud. You have to wave in front of their
eyes.”
Indeed, reflecting on reality understandably isn’t
at the top of the list of people wrapped up in their everyday lives of work and
play and taking care of families. But Schall believes such reflection is the trademark
of human beings and I believe it’s crucial in the search for God.
“… The existence of things bears all the marks of
choice, abundance, and truth,” writes Schall. “And if this is so, what is the
primary human reaction to the existence of things, one that must be there
before all others? It can only be, I think, that of gratitude….”
I guess that’s what I conclude by observing the
birds at the feeder. I reflect that everything that exists out there exists
without me or my kind having anything to do with it. It makes it really hard for
me to accept the view that there is no meaning to the universe, that what is
has blindly followed a random scheme and that all the beauty in the world has
no particular purpose apart from providing some evolutionary advantage.
Schall may be right that the only rational, honest
reaction to this unexplained and gratuitous gift of existence is one of
gratitude, but we may ask to whom or what to direct it. Should we thank the
stars, the universe, life itself? If so, I believe we would be confusing the
creator with the created.
We may find it hard to accept uncertainty and doubt
as part of faith, but we should not shun the obvious. The gift of existence
should animate us to continue in a sincere, dogged search for God, following
our hearts as well as our minds and maintaining a certain independence from contemporary “wisdom.”
That's a big advantage humans have over the birds at the feeder.
Comments
Post a Comment