Our Place in the Universe


Google Image
I’ll bet as you go about your daily chores, you think about how the universe is expanding and how it affects you, right?

No? Well, Tom Siegfried, writing in Science News, calls the expanding universe “the greatest intellectual upheaval in the human conception of the cosmos since Copernicus,” who lived about 500 years ago.

I see a couple of parallels here between science and religion. The first is that scientists are constantly making inferences about the universe from their observations. They don’t actually see the universe expanding. They infer it from what they can see and from mathematical calculations based on their observations. And that’s the case for lots of other cosmological discoveries, like the Big Bang and black holes.

Religion does something similar. Few people, if any, have actually seen God. But there are plenty of reasons to infer his/her existence. Among them is the fact that virtually all civilizations have had some idea of God. Similarly, all people seem to have some idea of right vs. wrong, what some people call the natural law “written on their hearts.” From these and other observations, we infer God’s existence. (This is, of course, leaving out the question of the “gift of faith.”)

How God Reveals Him/herself
The Hebrew Bible describes how God, presumably after preparation of just under a million years - the reported duration of human life on earth - reveals him/herself to human beings, and the Christian Bible says that God actually becomes a human being to show us, among other things, how to be one.

One of the names of this God-man is Emanuel, in Hebrew, “God with Us.” For believers, it responds to the question heard throughout the ages, “Where is your God?”

A second parallel between science and religion is that few people who accept these inferences about God think about it much as they go about their lives. All in all, we’re pretty ho-hum about it, and maybe that’s for the best. If we really grasped its awesomeness we probably wouldn’t get anything done.

Ancient believers made inferences, too, from the astonishing beauty of nature. Here’s a sample from Psalm 8 in the Jerusalem Bible translation.

Rabbi Polish
Google Image
“I look up at your heavens, made by your fingers,
At the moon and stars you set in place -
Ah, what is man that you should spare a thought for him?
The son of man that you should care for him?”

Writing in a recent issue of America Magazine, Rabbi Daniel Polish says that for the ancient Hebrews, the heavenly bodies weren’t objects of worship as they were for some surrounding civilizations, but that “the splendors of the heavens point beyond themselves and testify to the power of their Creator.

“And yet even as we feel the greatness of God so deeply, we feel welling up within us – as Job must have felt – a sense of our own smallness and insignificance.” But the psalm continues,

“Yet you have made him little less than a god,
You have crowned him with glory and splendor,
Made him lord over the work of your hands,
Set all things under his feet.”

Infinite Worth of Human Life
Although we might imagine ourselves unworthy of God’s attention, writes Polish, this psalm “affirms the infinite worth of human life.”

This idea isn’t popular in today’s world. In so many places and so many circumstances, life is cheap. People are disposable, replaceable. Animals and even plants are considered just about as smart and valuable. We’re not all we thought we were. Sometimes, we’re even ashamed to be part of the human race.


“And yet we matter,” writes Polish. “…We are of the greatest possible significance to the order of God’s creation.”

These ideas should shape the lives of believers, and provide thought fodder for people searching for God at a time when so many are wondering about their place in the universe.




















Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel of The Little Prince

Image
  Attention all those concerned only with “matters of great consequence:” Is it possible that you’ve become someone you didn’t want to be, having strayed far from the innocence and simplicity of childhood? That’s the main question asked in The Little Prince, which Netflix, the streaming video service, has added to its repertoire of movies and TV shows. Though not a big fan of animated flicks, I was a big fan of the book, The Little Prince, back in the 1970s when it became extremely popular in the U.S. It was first published in French and English in New York in 1943 as a novella by French aristocrat, writer, poet, and pioneering aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupery , who disappeared while piloting a Free French Army plane the following year over the Mediterranean Sea. Nearly Two Million Copies “The novella is the fourth most-translated book in the world and was voted the best book of the 20th century in France,” says Wikipedia. “Translated into more than 250 language...
Read more

‘Spiritual but Not Religious,’ Revisited

Image
Google Image I’ve expressed several times in these blogs my skepticism about declarations by some of our contemporaries that they are “spiritual but not religious.” Much of the skepticism results from the false dichotomy this entails, as if the spiritual and religious are mutually exclusive. Spirituality, after all, is the whole point of being religious. With the exception of some forms of Buddhism, all the major religions aim to bring people closer to God, who is “spiritual.” St. Paul, among the earliest leaders of Christianity, wrote that he is imparting a teaching “not taught by human wisdom but taught by the spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.” But Daniel Horan, Franciscan priest, theologian and author, wrote in a recent edition of the National Catholic Reporter: “What if our starting point in thinking about what it means to be a person in communion with God, oneself and the world was not reduced to external expressions of institutional belo...
Read more

Clinging to Archie Bunker's God

Image
Google Image Archie Bunker, the character masterfully played by the late Carroll O’Conner in the 1970s TV comedy “All in the Family,” had his own take on the traditional Christian doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. “God don’t make no mistakes,” declared Archie. “That’s how he got to be God.” For those too young to remember Archie, who in 2005 was listed as number 1 on Bravo's 100 Greatest TV Characters, Wikipedia says Bunker was characterized by his bigotry towards “… blacks, Hispanics, "Commies," gays, hippies, Jews, Asians, Catholics, "women's libbers," and Polish-Americans….” Bunker was presented as a Christian, however, and “… often misquotes the Bible. He takes pride in being religious, although he rarely attends church services ….” An Anonymous Contributor Sister Mary Matilda, my eighth grade teacher, would accuse me of being uncharitable but I imagine that an anonymous contributor to a recent newspaper column is an “Archie Bunke...
Read more