Does God Intervene in our Lives?

Google Image
My friend Bob, a retired lawyer, is a lifelong Christian and regular church-goer. But like me, he considers himself a skeptic. That may be why he’s a regular reader of this blog, one of whose principle aims is to assert that skepticism and faith are not mutually exclusive.

We meet regularly over coffee and discuss mostly religion and politics, society’s two most taboo subjects. We’ve often discussed the subject of God’s intervention in our lives: Does he/she or doesn’t he/she?

We agree that God doesn’t do so often, if at all. Bob leans firmly toward the “not at all,” saying he’d like to believe otherwise but his interpretation of history and the facts prevents him from doing so. He believes God hasn’t intervened in human history since the death of Jesus. I believe that God has intervened and, on occasion, still does.

God-With-Us
The whole premise of Christianity, after all, is that God definitively intervened in the person of Jesus – whose other name, “Emmanuel,” means “God-With-Us.” According to the New Testament and subsequent history - starting with the Acts of the Apostles - a “cloud of witnesses” have asserted that he/she is still with us. And prayer, in which we often ask God to intervene, is a staple of Christianity as it is with most religious faiths.

For many of us, however, prayers of petition, unlike prayers of adoration, thanksgiving and contrition, raise hard questions. Personally, I think many such prayers – and these include many that Catholics regularly hear in the “Prayers of the Faithful” at Mass – are misdirected.

Take prayers in which we ask God to take care of the poor. Doesn’t God expect us to do that? Or prayers seeking peace. Doesn’t he want us to be his/her instruments of peace? Wouldn’t it be better to ask God to help us be who we should be and do what we should do?

So how do you know if God has heard your prayers? Let’s say you pray fervently for something you want, or want to happen, and you don’t get it. Does that mean God didn’t hear your prayer? Or you pray fervently for something you want, or want to happen, and you get it. Does that mean God did hear you?

Google Image
Granted, it’s hard to tell the difference between a “no” and a “no reply,” but in both instances above, I would say “not necessarily.”

In my relationship with God, I like the analogy of parent-child. When I was a kid, I remember asking my parents for a pony. I had no idea about the implications of such a request. We lived in a city in a two-story frame house with small front and back yards. There was no way we could keep a pony there, and if not there, where? And none of my family knew the first thing about caring for horses.

I don’t recall how my parents’ “no” to the pony was framed, but however it was, it didn’t greatly affect me. I went on with the important things, like playing.

Some say God’s intervention makes him/her arbitrary. Doesn’t a mother sometimes accede to a request by one child and not another, depending on the circumstances? Does that make her arbitrary?

God's Ways Are Not Our Ways
I picture my relationship with God along those lines. If I pray fervently for a friend’s recovery, for instance, and it doesn’t happen, it doesn’t mean God hasn’t heard my prayer. It means that, as the prophet Isaiah says, “God’s ways are not our ways.” His/her reasons are simply beyond my grasp. I’m convinced, however, that some of my prayers of petition have been answered with a “yes.”

Jesus’ disciples asked him to teach them to pray and he responded with what we call “the Lord’s prayer,” a model of how Christians should pray. And in what is perhaps the most direct instruction on the topic, St. Paul urges readers in his first letter to the Thessalonians to “pray constantly, giving thanks in all circumstances.”

God gives us freedom to accept or reject his invitation of mutual love and I believe his/her frequent and continual intervention in our lives would jeopardize that freedom. Still, God’s intervention is evident in the Bible and in the lives of many throughout the ages. There’s no reason to believe it doesn’t happen in our age as well.







Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel of The Little Prince

Image
  Attention all those concerned only with “matters of great consequence:” Is it possible that you’ve become someone you didn’t want to be, having strayed far from the innocence and simplicity of childhood? That’s the main question asked in The Little Prince, which Netflix, the streaming video service, has added to its repertoire of movies and TV shows. Though not a big fan of animated flicks, I was a big fan of the book, The Little Prince, back in the 1970s when it became extremely popular in the U.S. It was first published in French and English in New York in 1943 as a novella by French aristocrat, writer, poet, and pioneering aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupery , who disappeared while piloting a Free French Army plane the following year over the Mediterranean Sea. Nearly Two Million Copies “The novella is the fourth most-translated book in the world and was voted the best book of the 20th century in France,” says Wikipedia. “Translated into more than 250 language...
Read more

‘Spiritual but Not Religious,’ Revisited

Image
Google Image I’ve expressed several times in these blogs my skepticism about declarations by some of our contemporaries that they are “spiritual but not religious.” Much of the skepticism results from the false dichotomy this entails, as if the spiritual and religious are mutually exclusive. Spirituality, after all, is the whole point of being religious. With the exception of some forms of Buddhism, all the major religions aim to bring people closer to God, who is “spiritual.” St. Paul, among the earliest leaders of Christianity, wrote that he is imparting a teaching “not taught by human wisdom but taught by the spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.” But Daniel Horan, Franciscan priest, theologian and author, wrote in a recent edition of the National Catholic Reporter: “What if our starting point in thinking about what it means to be a person in communion with God, oneself and the world was not reduced to external expressions of institutional belo...
Read more

Clinging to Archie Bunker's God

Image
Google Image Archie Bunker, the character masterfully played by the late Carroll O’Conner in the 1970s TV comedy “All in the Family,” had his own take on the traditional Christian doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. “God don’t make no mistakes,” declared Archie. “That’s how he got to be God.” For those too young to remember Archie, who in 2005 was listed as number 1 on Bravo's 100 Greatest TV Characters, Wikipedia says Bunker was characterized by his bigotry towards “… blacks, Hispanics, "Commies," gays, hippies, Jews, Asians, Catholics, "women's libbers," and Polish-Americans….” Bunker was presented as a Christian, however, and “… often misquotes the Bible. He takes pride in being religious, although he rarely attends church services ….” An Anonymous Contributor Sister Mary Matilda, my eighth grade teacher, would accuse me of being uncharitable but I imagine that an anonymous contributor to a recent newspaper column is an “Archie Bunke...
Read more