An Antidote to Feeling “Alone”

 

Google Image

I’ve been watching a “reality show” on the History Channel called “Alone.”

It features 10 people, who the credits say are trained survivalists. They agree to live in the Arctic, alone with a camera and in extreme conditions for an extended period. They are dropped off with only what they can carry in their backpacks.

They each have a telephone that allows them to communicate with the show’s producers. But it is only to be used for emergencies or to ask to drop out and be returned to civilization. Each month during their stay in the wilderness, a medical team visits to make sure the participants are physically fit to continue. The one who outlasts all the rest wins $500,000.

I find the show fascinating in that it captures not only the physical difficulties involved but the psychological ramifications of extreme isolation. Assuming that the show is as advertised (Some “reality shows” are said to be highly scripted and planned.), it shows the incredible ingenuity and perseverance, despite extreme hardship, of its participants. They have to find their own food, by hunting, fishing and trapping, and build their own shelter against Arctic cold and wind. Since I’ve started viewing the show, six of the 10 have dropped out.

Desperately Wanted To Stay

The latest to go was a woman who thought she was in good condition, felt good – considering the circumstances – and desperately wanted to stay. The medics who came to examine her for the health check, however, found that several organ systems were at risk of failure and she was removed contrary to her wishes.

Before her, a man who apparently was in good physical condition and had described himself as “macho,” broke down crying while filming after about a month and a half in the wilderness. He missed his family and former life to the extent that he no longer cared about the prize money. He asked to be removed.

All of them faced daily hunger, isolation, risks from injury, exposure to extreme autumn and winter weather and risk of attack by animals. One had to fight off a wolverine.

Abbot Benedict
According to what they said while filming themselves, most participants were mainly interested in the prize money. Some said they enjoyed the challenge and living in the beautiful setting of northern Canada. All of them emphasized the importance of winning.

If any of them had any religious convictions, they weren’t obvious. Some of them commented about the importance of their families and one person regularly gave thanks to “the universe.” I couldn’t help but think that recognition of God’s presence would have been a help to them, providing meaning to all they were experiencing in nature.

After watching the last episode, I read a reflection by Benedict Neenan, abbot of Conception Abbey in Missouri, in the monastery publication “Tower Topics.” I think the participants of “Alone” could have benefited by his words.

“The world is always God’s good creation,” he wrote. “Yet it is full of dangerous elements. Everything God has made contains great beauty and bounty, but some of it also causes harm: extreme weather, earthquakes, diseases, and viruses that can be deadly.” I would add all the horrible and spiteful things we humans do to one another.

World Not Against Us

“All those changes in the weather, plates of the earth, and mutating viruses are part of the world that God created good and gave us to live in, understand and steward. The world is not against us, but it has the power and independence from us that we have to respect and adapt to.

“If our attention is only focused on earthly things, we will alternately be awed and terrified, pleased and disgusted, happy and disappointed. We will conclude that life’s goal is to maximize pleasures and avoid as many sufferings as possible.

“…Goodness lies not only in good health, pleasant experiences, and close relationships,” the abbot continued. “It also comes from acting rightly toward God, one another, ourselves and God’s creation, and that will undoubtedly entail suffering and hardship.”

 

 

   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel of The Little Prince

Image
  Attention all those concerned only with “matters of great consequence:” Is it possible that you’ve become someone you didn’t want to be, having strayed far from the innocence and simplicity of childhood? That’s the main question asked in The Little Prince, which Netflix, the streaming video service, has added to its repertoire of movies and TV shows. Though not a big fan of animated flicks, I was a big fan of the book, The Little Prince, back in the 1970s when it became extremely popular in the U.S. It was first published in French and English in New York in 1943 as a novella by French aristocrat, writer, poet, and pioneering aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupery , who disappeared while piloting a Free French Army plane the following year over the Mediterranean Sea. Nearly Two Million Copies “The novella is the fourth most-translated book in the world and was voted the best book of the 20th century in France,” says Wikipedia. “Translated into more than 250 language...
Read more

‘Spiritual but Not Religious,’ Revisited

Image
Google Image I’ve expressed several times in these blogs my skepticism about declarations by some of our contemporaries that they are “spiritual but not religious.” Much of the skepticism results from the false dichotomy this entails, as if the spiritual and religious are mutually exclusive. Spirituality, after all, is the whole point of being religious. With the exception of some forms of Buddhism, all the major religions aim to bring people closer to God, who is “spiritual.” St. Paul, among the earliest leaders of Christianity, wrote that he is imparting a teaching “not taught by human wisdom but taught by the spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.” But Daniel Horan, Franciscan priest, theologian and author, wrote in a recent edition of the National Catholic Reporter: “What if our starting point in thinking about what it means to be a person in communion with God, oneself and the world was not reduced to external expressions of institutional belo...
Read more

Clinging to Archie Bunker's God

Image
Google Image Archie Bunker, the character masterfully played by the late Carroll O’Conner in the 1970s TV comedy “All in the Family,” had his own take on the traditional Christian doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. “God don’t make no mistakes,” declared Archie. “That’s how he got to be God.” For those too young to remember Archie, who in 2005 was listed as number 1 on Bravo's 100 Greatest TV Characters, Wikipedia says Bunker was characterized by his bigotry towards “… blacks, Hispanics, "Commies," gays, hippies, Jews, Asians, Catholics, "women's libbers," and Polish-Americans….” Bunker was presented as a Christian, however, and “… often misquotes the Bible. He takes pride in being religious, although he rarely attends church services ….” An Anonymous Contributor Sister Mary Matilda, my eighth grade teacher, would accuse me of being uncharitable but I imagine that an anonymous contributor to a recent newspaper column is an “Archie Bunke...
Read more