Can Religion Change Society?

Google Image

This blog, Skeptical Faith, is not about politics. I know some of the issues I discuss seem to favor one party over the other, but it’s not because of loyalty to a political party. It’s because I believe some issues, which happen to sometimes align with a political party, are an important part of the search for God.

They’re mostly social justice issues about which religion, particularly Catholicism - the religion I confess - cares deeply because the issues reflect gospel values expressed in such exhortations as the Beatitudes and parables such as the Good Samaritan and the Prodigal Son.

Nonetheless, I follow politics and have been particularly struck during the past decade by the extent to which political campaigns show the stark failings of politics in particular and American society in general. It was particularly evident in the last two presidential campaigns, in 2016 and 2020.

Excluded

The campaigns of Donald Trump, the 2016 winner, and presidential contender Bernie Sanders showed the extent to which a huge segment of the population feels left out, excluded from full participation in the American dream. This was equally evident in the 2020 campaign.

In many cases, the politics of the left-out reflects bitterness, resentment and frustration. In my opinion, it also reflects the value society places on “success,” money, status and possessions and its rejection of people who don’t measure up.

I believe the government can, and should, do what it can to alleviate their feelings of exclusion through social and justice measures, but that won’t solve the deeper problem that is shared by Democrats, Republicans and Independents: the failure to recognize the dignity of all, which is an ethical, not a political problem.

So what has this got to do with the search for God? Everything, because as I’ve mentioned before in these blogs, the search for God cannot be a “Jesus-and-me” thing. Genuine religion, as the letter of James in the New Testament says, is “to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world.”

Google Image
In other words, religion is communal. It fosters the common good. It can’t exist without a sense of solidarity, particularly with people who are on the margins of society: the unemployed, the poor, the immigrant, the elderly, the person of color. This is a constant theme of Pope Francis and of many religious leaders.

A recent article in the magazine Commonweal by David Albertson, associate professor of religion at the University of Southern California, and Jason Blakely, associate professor of political science at Pepperdine University, points this out.

The pandemic placed a mirror in society’s face, they write, revealing “just how many pathologies were afflicting us: an economy in which “essential” workers are often the least well paid; steep racial hierarchies defended by militarized police forces; an electoral politics engulfed in spectacle and money; and social solidarity so tattered that fellow Americans could view one another as members of enemy camps.” What is needed, they point out, is an ethical transformation.

“Oh, sure,” you might say, “but that’s simply an unrealistic, Utopian idea. People are what they are. You can’t change them.”

Belief in Human Change

Well, that’s certainly true if you ignore the ethical problem and the human capacity for change. Could it be that that religion, that much-abused and abandoned step-sister of society, points the way to inclusion and a just economic system? Who or what else believes that humans can change and is talking about the need for ethical reform?

It’s religion that, day-in, day-out, is an agent of change, pointing out the need for an interior conversion, for the need for human beings to be transformed spiritually, to see things differently, to broaden our horizons, to recognize the benefits of a relationship with the Author of life and with each other. Neither politics nor most other institutions are capable of doing what’s needed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top of Form

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel of The Little Prince

Image
  Attention all those concerned only with “matters of great consequence:” Is it possible that you’ve become someone you didn’t want to be, having strayed far from the innocence and simplicity of childhood? That’s the main question asked in The Little Prince, which Netflix, the streaming video service, has added to its repertoire of movies and TV shows. Though not a big fan of animated flicks, I was a big fan of the book, The Little Prince, back in the 1970s when it became extremely popular in the U.S. It was first published in French and English in New York in 1943 as a novella by French aristocrat, writer, poet, and pioneering aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupery , who disappeared while piloting a Free French Army plane the following year over the Mediterranean Sea. Nearly Two Million Copies “The novella is the fourth most-translated book in the world and was voted the best book of the 20th century in France,” says Wikipedia. “Translated into more than 250 language...
Read more

‘Spiritual but Not Religious,’ Revisited

Image
Google Image I’ve expressed several times in these blogs my skepticism about declarations by some of our contemporaries that they are “spiritual but not religious.” Much of the skepticism results from the false dichotomy this entails, as if the spiritual and religious are mutually exclusive. Spirituality, after all, is the whole point of being religious. With the exception of some forms of Buddhism, all the major religions aim to bring people closer to God, who is “spiritual.” St. Paul, among the earliest leaders of Christianity, wrote that he is imparting a teaching “not taught by human wisdom but taught by the spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.” But Daniel Horan, Franciscan priest, theologian and author, wrote in a recent edition of the National Catholic Reporter: “What if our starting point in thinking about what it means to be a person in communion with God, oneself and the world was not reduced to external expressions of institutional belo...
Read more

Clinging to Archie Bunker's God

Image
Google Image Archie Bunker, the character masterfully played by the late Carroll O’Conner in the 1970s TV comedy “All in the Family,” had his own take on the traditional Christian doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. “God don’t make no mistakes,” declared Archie. “That’s how he got to be God.” For those too young to remember Archie, who in 2005 was listed as number 1 on Bravo's 100 Greatest TV Characters, Wikipedia says Bunker was characterized by his bigotry towards “… blacks, Hispanics, "Commies," gays, hippies, Jews, Asians, Catholics, "women's libbers," and Polish-Americans….” Bunker was presented as a Christian, however, and “… often misquotes the Bible. He takes pride in being religious, although he rarely attends church services ….” An Anonymous Contributor Sister Mary Matilda, my eighth grade teacher, would accuse me of being uncharitable but I imagine that an anonymous contributor to a recent newspaper column is an “Archie Bunke...
Read more