A Renowned Scientist Committed to His Faith

Google Image

A defining moment in U.S. history is occurring with little fanfare. Francis Collins, who has headed the National Institutes of Health for a dozen years, has announced that he is leaving that post by year’s end.

In a Twitter article, Nell Greenfieldboyce and Scott Neuman describe the Institutes as “the largest funder of basic and clinical biomedical research in the world.” Under Collins’ leadership, I would add, no institution has had a greater impact on American medicine and Americans’ health.

Trained as a geneticist, Collins was previously director of the National Center for Human Genome Research, which was in charge of a massive effort to fully identify humanity's genetic code. The project was completed in 2003.

To give some idea of the challenge, humans have between 20,000 and 25,000 genes. Each of us has two copies of each gene, one inherited from each parent.

Willingness to Be Upfront

But in my estimation, Collins’ greatest strength lies in his commitment to his faith and his willingness to be upfront about it. I’ve written about him many times in this blog, using his famous 2006 book, The Language of God.

When working with the White House staff for a speech on the completion of the DNA sequencing, Collins endorsed the inclusion of the following paragraph in a presidential speech about the genome project’s conclusion: “Today we are learning the language in which God created life. We are gaining ever more awe for the complexity, the beauty, and the wonder of God’s most divine and sacred gift.”

In his book, Collins writes that it was “awe-inspiring to realize that we have caught a glimpse of our own instruction book, previously known only to God.

Francis Collins
Google Image
“Many will be puzzled by these sentiments,” he wrote, “assuming that a rigorous scientist could not also be a serious believer in a transcendent God. This book aims to dispel that notion, by arguing that belief in God can be an entirely rational choice, and that the principles of faith are, in fact, complementary with the principles of science.”

Faith was not part of Collins’ childhood. But when he was five years old, his parents sent him and a brother to become members of a choir at an Episcopal church. They were told it would be a great way to learn music but they weren’t to take the religious teaching seriously. Collins followed their instructions.

At 14, he writes, “my eyes were opened to the wonderfully exciting and powerful methods of science,” and science became his career path. “By a few months into my college career, I became convinced that while many religious faiths had inspired interesting traditions of art and culture, they had no foundational truth.” He became an agnostic, then an atheist.

Then things started to change. In medical school, he writes, he was “astounded by the elegance of the human DNA code, and the multiple consequences of those rare careless moments of its copying mechanism.”

Very Powerful 

When it came to caring for patients in his third year, he began to notice “the spiritual aspect that many of them were going through. …If faith were a psychological crutch,” he concluded, “it must be a very powerful one.”

An elderly patient, a woman of faith, asked him outright what he believed. “I felt my face flush as I stammered out the words ‘I’m not really sure.’” He asked himself the question, “Does a scientist draw conclusions without considering the data? Could there be a more important question in all of human existence than ‘Is there a God?’”

He determined that all of his objections to faith were those of a schoolboy. That launched a lifetime of re-discovery of Christianity and a faith from which he has never looked back.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel of The Little Prince

Image
  Attention all those concerned only with “matters of great consequence:” Is it possible that you’ve become someone you didn’t want to be, having strayed far from the innocence and simplicity of childhood? That’s the main question asked in The Little Prince, which Netflix, the streaming video service, has added to its repertoire of movies and TV shows. Though not a big fan of animated flicks, I was a big fan of the book, The Little Prince, back in the 1970s when it became extremely popular in the U.S. It was first published in French and English in New York in 1943 as a novella by French aristocrat, writer, poet, and pioneering aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupery , who disappeared while piloting a Free French Army plane the following year over the Mediterranean Sea. Nearly Two Million Copies “The novella is the fourth most-translated book in the world and was voted the best book of the 20th century in France,” says Wikipedia. “Translated into more than 250 language...
Read more

‘Spiritual but Not Religious,’ Revisited

Image
Google Image I’ve expressed several times in these blogs my skepticism about declarations by some of our contemporaries that they are “spiritual but not religious.” Much of the skepticism results from the false dichotomy this entails, as if the spiritual and religious are mutually exclusive. Spirituality, after all, is the whole point of being religious. With the exception of some forms of Buddhism, all the major religions aim to bring people closer to God, who is “spiritual.” St. Paul, among the earliest leaders of Christianity, wrote that he is imparting a teaching “not taught by human wisdom but taught by the spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.” But Daniel Horan, Franciscan priest, theologian and author, wrote in a recent edition of the National Catholic Reporter: “What if our starting point in thinking about what it means to be a person in communion with God, oneself and the world was not reduced to external expressions of institutional belo...
Read more

Clinging to Archie Bunker's God

Image
Google Image Archie Bunker, the character masterfully played by the late Carroll O’Conner in the 1970s TV comedy “All in the Family,” had his own take on the traditional Christian doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. “God don’t make no mistakes,” declared Archie. “That’s how he got to be God.” For those too young to remember Archie, who in 2005 was listed as number 1 on Bravo's 100 Greatest TV Characters, Wikipedia says Bunker was characterized by his bigotry towards “… blacks, Hispanics, "Commies," gays, hippies, Jews, Asians, Catholics, "women's libbers," and Polish-Americans….” Bunker was presented as a Christian, however, and “… often misquotes the Bible. He takes pride in being religious, although he rarely attends church services ….” An Anonymous Contributor Sister Mary Matilda, my eighth grade teacher, would accuse me of being uncharitable but I imagine that an anonymous contributor to a recent newspaper column is an “Archie Bunke...
Read more