What Makes Us Happy?

Google Image

Attending church recently, I heard the gospel of the day - the annual reading that includes what is known as “the Beatitudes” - for what I calculate to be about the 75th time. (I’m guessing the age that I started paying attention.)

You know them, I’m sure, because they are among the most well-known parts of the Christian Bible.

 

“When Jesus saw the crowds, he went up the mountain, and after he had sat down, his disciples came to him. He began to teach them, saying:

 

"Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

Blessed are they who mourn, for they will be comforted.

Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the land.

Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for righteousness,

For they will be satisfied.

Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.

Blessed are the clean of heart, for they will see God.

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.”

 

Poetic


I always thought they were beautiful, poetic really, but hearing them over and over and implementing them in today’s world? Get real. What could they possibly mean for a person in today’s cultural and social climate who is searching for God, who may have doubts about religion, about the quality or “quantity” of his or her faith, even about God’s existence?

 

Poverty? Mourning? Meekness? Hunger for righteousness? Mercy? Cleanliness of heart? Peacemaking?

 

Nothing, it seems, could be more irrelevant in today’s world. They are utterly antithetical to what society says is important. 

 

Yes, but if you are serious about the search for God, if you seek him/her in the Christian tradition, shouldn’t you be into this teaching? Of course, but we’re human and humans don’t have a sterling record of doing what we’re supposed to do or what we say we’re going to do. Does that deflate the value of the Beatitudes? I don’t think so.

 

Google Image
Look at New Year’s resolutions. We say we’re going to cut down on fats and sugars, for instance. Sometimes, we actually do. But often our determination wavers, sometimes quickly, and we’re back to square one. Does that alter the value of the resolution? Does that mean that cutting down on fats and sugars is a bad idea for somebody who needs to do so? Likewise, the value of Beatitudes is not diminished by people who ignore them.

 

Let’s look at the Beatitudes a little more closely to see how we could actually live them out in our daily lives. The first thing to consider, in my opinion, is to see them as ideals, as goals to strive for. They’re not commandments. They’re Jesus’ prescription for happiness (“Happy” is one translation of “blessed.”), and true happiness is the goal of the Christian faith.

 

So, poverty of spirit will make us happy? That may seem unlikely, but what if we had less interest in stuff, in acquiring it and keeping it? Wouldn’t that make us happier? And couldn’t we have more of this spirit if we focused on loving God and others and curtailed our focus on stuff?

 

Happiness and Mourning?


What about “those who mourn?” That pretty much covers all of us since, except for the hard of heart, we all will mourn at some time in our lives. I believe Jesus is reminding us that death itself has meaning, that it’s not the end, that “eye has not seen nor ear heard, nor has it entered into the heart of man, what God has prepared for those who love him.”

 

And about being “meek,” does this mean that we’re relegated to a life of wimpiness? You only have to read the gospels to see that Jesus himself was no wimp. The first dictionary definition of “meek” is “humbly patient or quiet in nature, as under provocation from others.” Wouldn’t that make us happier?

 

You could go on with the other Beatitudes, and like placing the list of New Year’s resolutions on the refrigerator door, I need to hear them read at church at least once a year.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel of The Little Prince

Image
  Attention all those concerned only with “matters of great consequence:” Is it possible that you’ve become someone you didn’t want to be, having strayed far from the innocence and simplicity of childhood? That’s the main question asked in The Little Prince, which Netflix, the streaming video service, has added to its repertoire of movies and TV shows. Though not a big fan of animated flicks, I was a big fan of the book, The Little Prince, back in the 1970s when it became extremely popular in the U.S. It was first published in French and English in New York in 1943 as a novella by French aristocrat, writer, poet, and pioneering aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupery , who disappeared while piloting a Free French Army plane the following year over the Mediterranean Sea. Nearly Two Million Copies “The novella is the fourth most-translated book in the world and was voted the best book of the 20th century in France,” says Wikipedia. “Translated into more than 250 language...
Read more

‘Spiritual but Not Religious,’ Revisited

Image
Google Image I’ve expressed several times in these blogs my skepticism about declarations by some of our contemporaries that they are “spiritual but not religious.” Much of the skepticism results from the false dichotomy this entails, as if the spiritual and religious are mutually exclusive. Spirituality, after all, is the whole point of being religious. With the exception of some forms of Buddhism, all the major religions aim to bring people closer to God, who is “spiritual.” St. Paul, among the earliest leaders of Christianity, wrote that he is imparting a teaching “not taught by human wisdom but taught by the spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.” But Daniel Horan, Franciscan priest, theologian and author, wrote in a recent edition of the National Catholic Reporter: “What if our starting point in thinking about what it means to be a person in communion with God, oneself and the world was not reduced to external expressions of institutional belo...
Read more

Clinging to Archie Bunker's God

Image
Google Image Archie Bunker, the character masterfully played by the late Carroll O’Conner in the 1970s TV comedy “All in the Family,” had his own take on the traditional Christian doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. “God don’t make no mistakes,” declared Archie. “That’s how he got to be God.” For those too young to remember Archie, who in 2005 was listed as number 1 on Bravo's 100 Greatest TV Characters, Wikipedia says Bunker was characterized by his bigotry towards “… blacks, Hispanics, "Commies," gays, hippies, Jews, Asians, Catholics, "women's libbers," and Polish-Americans….” Bunker was presented as a Christian, however, and “… often misquotes the Bible. He takes pride in being religious, although he rarely attends church services ….” An Anonymous Contributor Sister Mary Matilda, my eighth grade teacher, would accuse me of being uncharitable but I imagine that an anonymous contributor to a recent newspaper column is an “Archie Bunke...
Read more