The Benefit of Companions on the Journey
Google Image |
She thought it was funny, and I sort of did, too, and was
never offended by it. Truth is, though, I seldom wore a “frock,” and I wasn’t
de-anything’d. I freely sought a dispensation from my promises as a priest and was
granted it.
Although through the years I’ve had serious doubts about my
faith, my leaving the priesthood was not a rebellion against the church. I was
never treated with anything but respect by church members, including the dozens
of priests and nuns with whom I studied and worked. And as I’ve mentioned
before in this blog, once I accepted that the only way to determine the
existence of a personal God is by faith, most of the rest of what the church
teaches was a walk in the park. I simply couldn’t live a life of celibacy.
Some ex-priests have left the church or become its enemy,
and I’ve had my differences with how the church operates. But I could no more
leave the church than I could my family. And I can’t see how leaving the church
can do anything to change the things about the church I don’t like. You can’t
bail out and expect others to promote the changes you want.
Of course, the key is caring. You can’t change anything
unless you care about it, and I understand that many people simply don’t care
about the church, if not God or religion. That includes many Catholics and, presumably, some
people who read this blog regularly.
A problem for Americans in the Catholic Church is that it’s
not democratic. However, I believe that in its slow, deliberative way, it is becoming more so and will continue to
do so. It is filled with consultative bodies, on the parish, diocesan, national
and world levels. And in an unprecedented move, the Vatican recently issued a
worldwide survey on family life that includes questions about people’s views on
birth control, cohabitation before marriage and gay marriage. A meeting of
bishops is set to discuss the survey’s results next October.
(I again ask the indulgence of non-Catholics. I know I tend
to write a lot about Catholicism, which is what I know best. Much of this can
be applied to other faiths, however.)
I suspect a lot of people leave the church after much
soul-searching and even agonizing analysis. Others, I suspect, leave as a reaction
to a cliché, not the church I know and love. To me, the church is at once
complex and simple. It’s not primarily the pope, the Vatican curia or bishops
and priests, although there is a sense in which the church is an “organization.”
It’s a community of people on a communal search for God, having found important
clues that encourages the trek.
It includes solidarity with believers in my family and others
far back into history, to the time of Christ himself. I have a hard time
understanding the modern cult of the celebrity who excels in sports, popular
music or the cinema, but has doubtful ethics. After all, it’s easy to be a “bad
boy,” hard to consistently do what’s right.
My heroes are the “saints,” canonized or not, who, though considered
naïve or unrealistic, heroically follow Jesus’ teachings.
In a time when trends last only months or years, when
society rushes from one “new thing” to another, having a sense of solidarity
with those believers is important.
Google Image |
Recognizing that all analogies fall short, the church is
sort of like those pioneers who crossed the western U.S. during the 1800s. They
were all on a journey together for many different reasons but pulling for each
other and defending each other to the hilt. Some left to take a different
route, but that was OK, as long as they were trying to reach the same goal.
I often feel this sense of community when celebrating Mass
with fellow believers, feeling that we’re on a pilgrimage together. And I often
have a sense of loss when perceiving that many others who were formerly there seem
to have abandoned the journey. Only God knows whether that’s actually the case,
of course.
As I’ve mentioned in previous blogs, some might say the
sense of peace and joy that comes from belief is what Karl Marx was talking
about when he called religion the “opium of the people,” that believers are simply
involved in massive self-deceit. But that’s a superficial look at faith and the
solidarity with other believers that is part of the deal.
Returning to the analogy of the pilgrims crossing the
American west, there were certainly “no-goods” among them, at least according
to the Westerns that I watched incessantly as a kid. There were people who
faked having the common vision of the pioneers, people who just went along for
the ride and people who took advantage of others and whose deeds embarrassed
those whose vision was sincere.
That hasn’t changed. It’s obvious that all of us pilgrims are
scarred. Some in our number do horrible things in the name of religion. The
incidents of child abuse by the clergy are only the latest examples. Some are
hypocritical to the hilt. Others are simply clueless and mindlessly follow the
rituals and dogmas. I believe, however, that the vast majority of Christians
are sincere and recognize the benefits of searching for God as members of the
church.
Among those benefits are shared hope, and the trust in God and
others that results from that hope. Even a “defrocked priest” can recognize
these benefits, and profit by them.
Comments
Post a Comment