Where Did We Get the Idea of “God?”

Google Image
People searching for God have probably asked themselves this question at one time or another.

And the short answer is, it depends on whose god you’re talking about.

Worship of a god or gods is shrouded in the cloud of history, or rather, pre-history. The concept of God as most modern people envision him/her results from any of three abstract ideas or their combination, according to Wikipedia, and of course, the Bible, the Koran and similar sacred books.

The abstractions range from God as “…the deification of an esoteric, mystical or philosophical entity or category” to God as the “Ultimate,” the “greatest good,” the “absolute infinite” the “Transcendent," to God as “the ground of being.”

Many may not be familiar with these concepts because they originate in the philosophical world of Greek philosophers like Aristotle, who lived in the fourth century before Christ (BC). At some point – definitively with the ideas of Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century after Christ (AD) – these notions became mixed with the biblical idea of a God who is human-like.

In His Image
“So God made man in his own image,” says the Book of Genesis.

Some skeptics say it should read, “Man made God in his own image.” And there is truth in that because we project onto God all kinds of human traits, good and bad. But more on that later.

Surprisingly, though Genesis is the first book in the Hebrew Bible, it’s not the earliest. The books of Psalms, Amos, 1st Isaiah, Hosea and Micah are believed to be the earliest, written between 745 and 586 BC. Genesis is among the books written in the period 583-330 BC.



All pre-date Aristotle and the Greek philosophers, however, and the Bible is believed to contain many stories and myths from other religions that may be even more ancient.


Google Image
For Christians and Jews, the Hebrew Bible is the original source for our belief in God. It promotes the vision of a personal God who gets angry, repents of his anger, is jealous and petty but also compassionate, loving and merciful, someone who can be seen “walking in the garden in the cool of the day,” as Genesis describes him.

This idea of a “human” God took a giant leap for Christians when God became a human being as Jesus of Nazareth. My friend, Ted Wolgamot, a psychologist who writes a blog at “Dr. Ted’s Web,” (http://drtedsweb.com) wrote recently of the scene in Luke’s gospel about Jesus coming upon a funeral procession in which a widow, accompanied by a group of her friends and neighbors, was on her way to bury her only son.

Jesus, says the gospel, was “moved with pity” for the woman, and he did something unheard of by raising him from the dead.

“Notice in the story,” writes Ted, “that Jesus never asks the woman about how faithfully she has fulfilled all the commandments. Jesus never asks her how impeccably she has obeyed all the rules and all the traditions and all the laws. Jesus never asks her anything. He sees her tears. And the tears tell him all he needs to know.”

But the most amazing thing about the Judeo-Christian idea of God isn’t that he/she exists or is the author of life but that God would care about us. Together with ancient people, we ask “Why?” 

“What is man that you think of him,” asks Psalm 8, “the son of man that you care for him?”

The traditional answer would be, “It’s a mystery.” For me, a better answer is that we simply don’t know.

The Hairs of Our Heads
That God should care for humans in general is one thing, but that God should care about me in particular and each of the billions of others on earth is another. Yet, says Jesus in Mathew’s gospel, “even the hairs of your head are all numbered.”

Another question regarding the origin of the idea of God pertains to humans’ receptivity to him/her.

“…The belief in a supernatural agent who operates in the world is universal to all cultures because it is hard-wired in the brain,” according to research on the subject in an article in the Wall Street Journal.

The article provides several explanatory theories, based on belief’s evolutionary benefits, but doesn’t mention the possibility that God is ultimately responsible for that human trait.

Leave it to us contemporary humans to ignore the obvious.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel of The Little Prince

Image
  Attention all those concerned only with “matters of great consequence:” Is it possible that you’ve become someone you didn’t want to be, having strayed far from the innocence and simplicity of childhood? That’s the main question asked in The Little Prince, which Netflix, the streaming video service, has added to its repertoire of movies and TV shows. Though not a big fan of animated flicks, I was a big fan of the book, The Little Prince, back in the 1970s when it became extremely popular in the U.S. It was first published in French and English in New York in 1943 as a novella by French aristocrat, writer, poet, and pioneering aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupery , who disappeared while piloting a Free French Army plane the following year over the Mediterranean Sea. Nearly Two Million Copies “The novella is the fourth most-translated book in the world and was voted the best book of the 20th century in France,” says Wikipedia. “Translated into more than 250 language...
Read more

‘Spiritual but Not Religious,’ Revisited

Image
Google Image I’ve expressed several times in these blogs my skepticism about declarations by some of our contemporaries that they are “spiritual but not religious.” Much of the skepticism results from the false dichotomy this entails, as if the spiritual and religious are mutually exclusive. Spirituality, after all, is the whole point of being religious. With the exception of some forms of Buddhism, all the major religions aim to bring people closer to God, who is “spiritual.” St. Paul, among the earliest leaders of Christianity, wrote that he is imparting a teaching “not taught by human wisdom but taught by the spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.” But Daniel Horan, Franciscan priest, theologian and author, wrote in a recent edition of the National Catholic Reporter: “What if our starting point in thinking about what it means to be a person in communion with God, oneself and the world was not reduced to external expressions of institutional belo...
Read more

Clinging to Archie Bunker's God

Image
Google Image Archie Bunker, the character masterfully played by the late Carroll O’Conner in the 1970s TV comedy “All in the Family,” had his own take on the traditional Christian doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. “God don’t make no mistakes,” declared Archie. “That’s how he got to be God.” For those too young to remember Archie, who in 2005 was listed as number 1 on Bravo's 100 Greatest TV Characters, Wikipedia says Bunker was characterized by his bigotry towards “… blacks, Hispanics, "Commies," gays, hippies, Jews, Asians, Catholics, "women's libbers," and Polish-Americans….” Bunker was presented as a Christian, however, and “… often misquotes the Bible. He takes pride in being religious, although he rarely attends church services ….” An Anonymous Contributor Sister Mary Matilda, my eighth grade teacher, would accuse me of being uncharitable but I imagine that an anonymous contributor to a recent newspaper column is an “Archie Bunke...
Read more