Finding Stars but No God

Google Image
I’ve been watching a documentary on Netflix on the Andes Mountains. The series is mostly about the natural beauty of the South American mountain range and the people who live there.

It included scenes of the famous Atacama Desert, the driest in the world, along the coast of Chile. And that’s the site of the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) a collection of 66 radio telescopes, operated by several countries and groups of countries – including the U.S. – to study star birth and planet formation. It’s an impressive array of sophisticated technology, costing $1.4 billion.

I found the presentation fascinating, but I couldn’t help but think of the story in the gospel of Mathew in which Jesus chides the Jewish leaders, noting that they knew how to predict the weather by observing the formation of clouds and the color of the sky but missed recognizing the signs that were important.

The "Easy" Things
“You know how to interpret the appearance of the sky,” he said, “but you cannot interpret the signs of the times.” Jesus may have been referring to the evils of his generation or the coming of the Messiah, who he claimed to be, or both. Ultimately, I believe, he was talking about doing the “easy” things and missing the things that count.

I don’t, of course, apply this quote from Jesus to the scientists in the Atacama, or those who designed or constructed the telescope site let alone the pursuit of science. It’s an analogy on how people today may be adept at technology but blind to what’s ultimately important.

Some would say that failing to find God through science confirms the non-existence of God. Given the nature of God, at least according to Christian theology, you wouldn't expect to find God by use of telescopes. Nonetheless, I believe there are rational reasons for belief and that people who don’t see God’s presence in the universe and among us are missing the obvious.

Google Image
In a blog back in 2017, I quoted my friend and former colleague, Jim Hardy, who wrote: “On an ordinary day, there are 400 billion suns in our Milky Way galaxy alone that burn and explode in cataclysmic fashion, with a ferocity beyond the limits of even a healthy imagination. The very effort to get one’s mind around that phenomenon can cause one’s knees to buckle. This is an ordinary day. That is an ordinary fire, albeit in a remote outpost of God’s kingdom.”

Hardy quotes famed theologian and paleontologist Teilhard de Chardin and author Annie Dillard.

“By means of all created things, without exception,” wrote Chardin, “the divine assails us, penetrates us and molds us. We imagine it as distant and inaccessible whereas we are steeped in its burning layers.”

Writes Dillard: “We live in all we seek. The hidden shows up in too-plain sight. It lives captive on the face of the obvious – the people, events, and things of the day – to which we as sophisticated children have long since become oblivious. What a hideout: Holiness lies spread and borne over the surface of time and stuff like color.”

More Than Rationality
What is also obvious is that more than rationality is required to see this reality. In fact, we may need to ask ourselves what it means to be “intelligent.” Our rationality and our emotions are in the same brain, after all, so “brainy” shouldn’t apply only to our rational intelligence but to our relatively recently discovered “emotional intelligence.”

From my limited reading on this subject, this has mostly to do with our relationship skills, so it should also apply to our relationship with “The Other.”

It’s puzzling why so many people ignore the basic questions about life: Why is there something rather than nothing? Does life have meaning or is it an absurdity of meaninglessness? Does God exist and does he/she have anything to do with me?

We’re good at searching for all sorts of things, like answers to questions about the stars, but not answers to these questions. There are answers, using both parts of the brain. But first we need to recognize that the search for God is worth the effort.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel of The Little Prince

Image
  Attention all those concerned only with “matters of great consequence:” Is it possible that you’ve become someone you didn’t want to be, having strayed far from the innocence and simplicity of childhood? That’s the main question asked in The Little Prince, which Netflix, the streaming video service, has added to its repertoire of movies and TV shows. Though not a big fan of animated flicks, I was a big fan of the book, The Little Prince, back in the 1970s when it became extremely popular in the U.S. It was first published in French and English in New York in 1943 as a novella by French aristocrat, writer, poet, and pioneering aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupery , who disappeared while piloting a Free French Army plane the following year over the Mediterranean Sea. Nearly Two Million Copies “The novella is the fourth most-translated book in the world and was voted the best book of the 20th century in France,” says Wikipedia. “Translated into more than 250 language...
Read more

‘Spiritual but Not Religious,’ Revisited

Image
Google Image I’ve expressed several times in these blogs my skepticism about declarations by some of our contemporaries that they are “spiritual but not religious.” Much of the skepticism results from the false dichotomy this entails, as if the spiritual and religious are mutually exclusive. Spirituality, after all, is the whole point of being religious. With the exception of some forms of Buddhism, all the major religions aim to bring people closer to God, who is “spiritual.” St. Paul, among the earliest leaders of Christianity, wrote that he is imparting a teaching “not taught by human wisdom but taught by the spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.” But Daniel Horan, Franciscan priest, theologian and author, wrote in a recent edition of the National Catholic Reporter: “What if our starting point in thinking about what it means to be a person in communion with God, oneself and the world was not reduced to external expressions of institutional belo...
Read more

Clinging to Archie Bunker's God

Image
Google Image Archie Bunker, the character masterfully played by the late Carroll O’Conner in the 1970s TV comedy “All in the Family,” had his own take on the traditional Christian doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. “God don’t make no mistakes,” declared Archie. “That’s how he got to be God.” For those too young to remember Archie, who in 2005 was listed as number 1 on Bravo's 100 Greatest TV Characters, Wikipedia says Bunker was characterized by his bigotry towards “… blacks, Hispanics, "Commies," gays, hippies, Jews, Asians, Catholics, "women's libbers," and Polish-Americans….” Bunker was presented as a Christian, however, and “… often misquotes the Bible. He takes pride in being religious, although he rarely attends church services ….” An Anonymous Contributor Sister Mary Matilda, my eighth grade teacher, would accuse me of being uncharitable but I imagine that an anonymous contributor to a recent newspaper column is an “Archie Bunke...
Read more