Why Faith Is Not Conformism

Google Image
I’m a bit of a hoarder. Not in the usual sense, because I’m almost anal in keeping things neat and clean. No, I hoard books, articles and bits and pieces of each, and thanks to a computer, I can do so without anyone noticing.

Several years ago, I squirreled away quotes from Diarmuid Martin, the Catholic archbishop of Dublin, who gave an interesting and informative speech at Fordham University in 2013, mostly about the changes in religious belief and practices in Ireland. I used some of the quotes in a blog in 2018, but taking another look at my notes, I found useful ideas about the nature of faith.

Martin’s insights are relevant, specifically, to the idea among many, including many who have given up on God and/or religion, that faith means conformity to someone else’s idea of spirituality, that it involves a check on freedom, preventing us from doing what we want.

Going Beyond Oneself
In a sense, that’s true, because faith is a slap at our culture’s worship of individualism, the idea that my wants and needs are what matter. Faith requires going beyond oneself, recognizing that we’re all in this together and that the common good trumps mine.

But it isn’t a matter of conformity. What good is any human endeavor that’s simply a matter of conforming to what others think or believe? Said Archbishop Martin:

“When faith leads to conformism, it has betrayed the very nature of faith,” Martin said. “Conformism falsely feels that it has attained certainty. Faith is always a leap into the unknown and a challenge to go beyond our own limits and beyond our own certainties and the distorted understanding that comes from them.”

Czech theologian and philosopher Tomas Halik puts it this way: “Faith is the possibility of re-interpreting what seemed so cut and dried from ‘the world’s’ point of view.”

Diarmuid Martin
Google Image
You could say, in fact, that it’s the rejection of faith – which is becoming the most popular position – that amounts to conformism.

Yes, you might respond, but if you are religious in the sense of belonging to a religion such as Christianity or Judaism, you have to conform to laws and rules that may not suit you. Take the 10 commandments, for a start.

That’s true only from the point of view of somebody who hasn’t internalized his/her faith. Once that happens, the norms of the Hebrew and Christian Bibles, and those of your faith tradition, become your own. Your most profound “rule” is the love of God and others and all that implies. To say that it’s imposed is to say that one’s own convictions are not his/her own. (That is possible, too, of course, when one’s convictions are superficial.)

This viewpoint implies a certain independence from any “institution.” I recognize my church’s leaders as reliable guides who deserve my respect and attention, but my faith doesn’t depend on them or anything they do or don’t do. When I think of “church,” in fact, I don’t think of bishops or priests or ministers, or any clerical bureaucracy. I think of “the people of God,” the community of believers with whom I worship and the wider universal community of believers.

I love my church and believe it’s the best path for me and many others. But I don’t believe God is contained or restrained by my brand of faith.

So if that’s the case, why be a believer or religious?

Difficult and Risky
There are many paths to belief, including intellectual and emotional ones. But it’s difficult, and risky, to travel those paths alone. Difficult, because as humans, most of us need the support of others in much of what we do. Risky, because our faith may turn out to be something we invent for our convenience, requiring few challenges and having little to do with the God who created and sustains us.  
“Many people say to me that they reject the church but still consider themselves believers in Jesus Christ,” said Archbishop Martin. “The difficulty is that in such a situation, without a personal and rigorous intellectual encounter with the Scriptures and Christian tradition, a person can drift into something that is their own, rather than a challenging encounter with their faith.”




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel of The Little Prince

Image
  Attention all those concerned only with “matters of great consequence:” Is it possible that you’ve become someone you didn’t want to be, having strayed far from the innocence and simplicity of childhood? That’s the main question asked in The Little Prince, which Netflix, the streaming video service, has added to its repertoire of movies and TV shows. Though not a big fan of animated flicks, I was a big fan of the book, The Little Prince, back in the 1970s when it became extremely popular in the U.S. It was first published in French and English in New York in 1943 as a novella by French aristocrat, writer, poet, and pioneering aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupery , who disappeared while piloting a Free French Army plane the following year over the Mediterranean Sea. Nearly Two Million Copies “The novella is the fourth most-translated book in the world and was voted the best book of the 20th century in France,” says Wikipedia. “Translated into more than 250 language...
Read more

‘Spiritual but Not Religious,’ Revisited

Image
Google Image I’ve expressed several times in these blogs my skepticism about declarations by some of our contemporaries that they are “spiritual but not religious.” Much of the skepticism results from the false dichotomy this entails, as if the spiritual and religious are mutually exclusive. Spirituality, after all, is the whole point of being religious. With the exception of some forms of Buddhism, all the major religions aim to bring people closer to God, who is “spiritual.” St. Paul, among the earliest leaders of Christianity, wrote that he is imparting a teaching “not taught by human wisdom but taught by the spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.” But Daniel Horan, Franciscan priest, theologian and author, wrote in a recent edition of the National Catholic Reporter: “What if our starting point in thinking about what it means to be a person in communion with God, oneself and the world was not reduced to external expressions of institutional belo...
Read more

Clinging to Archie Bunker's God

Image
Google Image Archie Bunker, the character masterfully played by the late Carroll O’Conner in the 1970s TV comedy “All in the Family,” had his own take on the traditional Christian doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. “God don’t make no mistakes,” declared Archie. “That’s how he got to be God.” For those too young to remember Archie, who in 2005 was listed as number 1 on Bravo's 100 Greatest TV Characters, Wikipedia says Bunker was characterized by his bigotry towards “… blacks, Hispanics, "Commies," gays, hippies, Jews, Asians, Catholics, "women's libbers," and Polish-Americans….” Bunker was presented as a Christian, however, and “… often misquotes the Bible. He takes pride in being religious, although he rarely attends church services ….” An Anonymous Contributor Sister Mary Matilda, my eighth grade teacher, would accuse me of being uncharitable but I imagine that an anonymous contributor to a recent newspaper column is an “Archie Bunke...
Read more