Cleaving to a Vengeful God

Google Image
Dear God,


Instead of letting people die and having to make new ones, why don't you just keep the ones you have now? 

 Jane

An excellent question, you might say, expressing a sentiment to which we can all relate.  Found on the Internet, it’s among the funny letters from children to God. It’s a hard question to answer unless placed in the context of how human beings were created through evolution and exist within the animal world. And as empathetic as we are to Jane, the question reveals a child’s simplistic view of God.

And it begs the question about our own view of God and where it comes from. You could say from our parents or grandparents, from church or synagogue or our superficially religious culture. For those whose heritage is Christianity or Judaism, it ultimately comes from the Bible.

In a Way That Suites Us
And the Bible is hard to understand, not only because it is of another age but because of the differences among its 72 books, its ancient languages and cultural contexts, and the tendency to interpret it in a way that suites us.

But contrary to those who think the Bible is a library of gobbledygook, modern scholarship has made it much easier to understand and accept as the word of God in the words of humans. It’s a combination of myth and history, a history of humans’ relationship to God. For people searching for God, it’s a treasury of useful knowledge and inspiration and its study is crucial.

James Martin
Google Image
And the evolution of the image of God in the Bible is obvious. The Hebrew Bible, being more primitive, is more reflective of humanity’s flaws, often presenting a God who is jealous and vindictive but sometimes a God who is just, merciful and loving.

In the Christian Bible, the loving Father is more often emphasized, though in fewer instances, the contrary image co-exists. I believe those who search for God in the Christian tradition should focus on Jesus’ God, the one who is just, merciful and loving.

No example of the image of God is more forceful than Jesus’ story of the Prodigal Son. For those whose memory of the story is fuzzy, it’s about a son and his father. The son asks for his inheritance and goes off to blow it in every direction. After several years of self-indulgence, he eventually runs out of money and returns to his father’s house to seek forgiveness. Instead of a cold shoulder, he gets a welcome party from a loving father.

James Martin, the Jesuit author, points out that the story could more accurately be called “the prodigal – or excessively generous – father,” and may have been told by Jesus as a response to the criticism of some Pharisees who complained that Jesus “welcomes sinners and eats with them.”

Says Martin, “Here’s an image of God not from your own mind, but from Jesus’ mind.”

A God Who Keeps Lists?
So much for the image of God so firmly planted in the minds of many: a God of vengeance, who keeps lists of all the bad things we do and makes sure we pay, here or in the hereafter. Oh, we may not admit it to ourselves, but many of us secretly cling to this god, ever fearful of his/her disapproving notice.

Who could really love such a God? No, this is a distortion of the God of Christians and Jews. So how do we know whether our image of God – which is always analogous – is accurate?

In his exhortation, The Joy of the Gospel, Pope Francis describes people who have the Prodigal-Son image of God.

“Hard times may come,” he writes, “when the cross casts its shadow, yet nothing can destroy the supernatural joy that adapts and changes, but always endures, even as a flicker of light born of our personal certainty that, when everything is said and done, we are infinitely loved.

“That joy brings deep security, serene hope and a spiritual fulfilment that the world cannot understand or appreciate.”










Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel of The Little Prince

Image
  Attention all those concerned only with “matters of great consequence:” Is it possible that you’ve become someone you didn’t want to be, having strayed far from the innocence and simplicity of childhood? That’s the main question asked in The Little Prince, which Netflix, the streaming video service, has added to its repertoire of movies and TV shows. Though not a big fan of animated flicks, I was a big fan of the book, The Little Prince, back in the 1970s when it became extremely popular in the U.S. It was first published in French and English in New York in 1943 as a novella by French aristocrat, writer, poet, and pioneering aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupery , who disappeared while piloting a Free French Army plane the following year over the Mediterranean Sea. Nearly Two Million Copies “The novella is the fourth most-translated book in the world and was voted the best book of the 20th century in France,” says Wikipedia. “Translated into more than 250 language...
Read more

‘Spiritual but Not Religious,’ Revisited

Image
Google Image I’ve expressed several times in these blogs my skepticism about declarations by some of our contemporaries that they are “spiritual but not religious.” Much of the skepticism results from the false dichotomy this entails, as if the spiritual and religious are mutually exclusive. Spirituality, after all, is the whole point of being religious. With the exception of some forms of Buddhism, all the major religions aim to bring people closer to God, who is “spiritual.” St. Paul, among the earliest leaders of Christianity, wrote that he is imparting a teaching “not taught by human wisdom but taught by the spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.” But Daniel Horan, Franciscan priest, theologian and author, wrote in a recent edition of the National Catholic Reporter: “What if our starting point in thinking about what it means to be a person in communion with God, oneself and the world was not reduced to external expressions of institutional belo...
Read more

Clinging to Archie Bunker's God

Image
Google Image Archie Bunker, the character masterfully played by the late Carroll O’Conner in the 1970s TV comedy “All in the Family,” had his own take on the traditional Christian doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. “God don’t make no mistakes,” declared Archie. “That’s how he got to be God.” For those too young to remember Archie, who in 2005 was listed as number 1 on Bravo's 100 Greatest TV Characters, Wikipedia says Bunker was characterized by his bigotry towards “… blacks, Hispanics, "Commies," gays, hippies, Jews, Asians, Catholics, "women's libbers," and Polish-Americans….” Bunker was presented as a Christian, however, and “… often misquotes the Bible. He takes pride in being religious, although he rarely attends church services ….” An Anonymous Contributor Sister Mary Matilda, my eighth grade teacher, would accuse me of being uncharitable but I imagine that an anonymous contributor to a recent newspaper column is an “Archie Bunke...
Read more