The Best We Can Do?

Google Image

It’s strange what you remember, and don’t remember, in old age.

I remember, for instance, the oddity of the snail darter – a tiny, seemingly insignificant fish that stopped for two years construction of the $487 million (in today’s dollars) Tellico Dam on the Tennessee River 45 years ago. The fish species had recently been discovered and environmental groups took the dam authority to court to stop construction.

Protection of the snail darter at the expense of the dam construction was a raging controversy. But eventually, the dam project was exempted from the U.S. Endangered Species Act and was completed. The snail darters were also saved from possible extinction after biologists moved them to other rivers.

What does this all have to do with the search for God?

Nothing More Controversial?

It’s just that in an attempt to help people who have given up on God and/or religion, I try not to shy away from controversies surrounding religious belief, and there’s nothing more controversial than abortion. And if the snail darter was worth saving – and I believe it was important to save a possibly extinct species – does it not make sense to save developing humans?

First, I believe that if you want to call yourself pro-life, you logically can’t be against immigrants, help for the poor and gun control and favor capital punishment, euthanasia and war. Cardinal Joseph Bernadin, the archbishop of Chicago who died in 1996, popularized the idea of the “seamless garment.” Comparing it to Jesus’ garment for which his executioners cast lots, the idea is that all these issues are linked as “pro-life.”

The Snail Darter
Google Image
“Pro-choice” advocates have done a masterful job of framing the issue. In the arena of public opinion, they have successfully deemed abortion a women’s issue, saying that abortion is simply women’s health care and a matter of males wanting control over women’s bodies. They have practically eliminated any discussion of abortion as an ethical, moral or human issue.

I'm an advocate for women's rights. I favor equal pay, abolition of "glass ceilings" for women's advancement and equal protection under the law. Throughout history, women have drawn the short straw, so often being victims of macho domination and violence. I'm happy that's changing, but not at the expense of other human beings or potential human beings, at least half of whom are females. 

From the perspective of one searching for God in the Christian tradition, I think abortion is the wrong choice. It's true that poor women, especially, often find themselves in a bind – financially and otherwise – when faced with an unwanted pregnancy. So, what we can do to minimize this problem short of eliminating developing humans.

I'm puzzled by pleas such as, "Bans Off Our Bodies." To say that a fetus within the body of its mother, though completely dependent on her for nutrition and protection, is part of the mother’s body, like a pancreas or kidney, is simply not true. Besides being genetically distinct, having genes from both parents and grandparents, the unborn possesses separate circulatory, nervous, and endocrine systems. It's a separate human being or potential human being.  

Nothing on Abortion

As for the search for God in the Christian tradition, it’s true that as far as we know, Jesus said nothing on the subject of abortion. But he endorsed the Ten Commandments, one of which is a proscription against killing. And he spent the greater part of his adult life trying to heal people, physically, emotionally and spiritually. I can’t imagine that he would endorse killing (and let’s use the right word here) an unborn human being.

“I have come to bring them life,” Jesus said, while explaining his parable about the sheep and the Good Shepherd in John's gospel, “and far more life than before.”

I understand that many people who favor abortion as a right, also believe theirs is a moral and ethical issue. I’d like to hear their moral and ethical arguments. 

Meanwhile, I can only ask again, if the snail darter is worth saving, why not a developing human? Is abortion the best we can do?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel of The Little Prince

Image
  Attention all those concerned only with “matters of great consequence:” Is it possible that you’ve become someone you didn’t want to be, having strayed far from the innocence and simplicity of childhood? That’s the main question asked in The Little Prince, which Netflix, the streaming video service, has added to its repertoire of movies and TV shows. Though not a big fan of animated flicks, I was a big fan of the book, The Little Prince, back in the 1970s when it became extremely popular in the U.S. It was first published in French and English in New York in 1943 as a novella by French aristocrat, writer, poet, and pioneering aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupery , who disappeared while piloting a Free French Army plane the following year over the Mediterranean Sea. Nearly Two Million Copies “The novella is the fourth most-translated book in the world and was voted the best book of the 20th century in France,” says Wikipedia. “Translated into more than 250 language...
Read more

‘Spiritual but Not Religious,’ Revisited

Image
Google Image I’ve expressed several times in these blogs my skepticism about declarations by some of our contemporaries that they are “spiritual but not religious.” Much of the skepticism results from the false dichotomy this entails, as if the spiritual and religious are mutually exclusive. Spirituality, after all, is the whole point of being religious. With the exception of some forms of Buddhism, all the major religions aim to bring people closer to God, who is “spiritual.” St. Paul, among the earliest leaders of Christianity, wrote that he is imparting a teaching “not taught by human wisdom but taught by the spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.” But Daniel Horan, Franciscan priest, theologian and author, wrote in a recent edition of the National Catholic Reporter: “What if our starting point in thinking about what it means to be a person in communion with God, oneself and the world was not reduced to external expressions of institutional belo...
Read more

Clinging to Archie Bunker's God

Image
Google Image Archie Bunker, the character masterfully played by the late Carroll O’Conner in the 1970s TV comedy “All in the Family,” had his own take on the traditional Christian doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. “God don’t make no mistakes,” declared Archie. “That’s how he got to be God.” For those too young to remember Archie, who in 2005 was listed as number 1 on Bravo's 100 Greatest TV Characters, Wikipedia says Bunker was characterized by his bigotry towards “… blacks, Hispanics, "Commies," gays, hippies, Jews, Asians, Catholics, "women's libbers," and Polish-Americans….” Bunker was presented as a Christian, however, and “… often misquotes the Bible. He takes pride in being religious, although he rarely attends church services ….” An Anonymous Contributor Sister Mary Matilda, my eighth grade teacher, would accuse me of being uncharitable but I imagine that an anonymous contributor to a recent newspaper column is an “Archie Bunke...
Read more