Why “skeptical faith?”

Google Image

Some readers may wonder why I call my blog “Skeptical Faith.” Aren’t the two words at odds, antithetical?

Not in my view. In fact, I hope that all believers are skeptics AND believers. Thesaurus.com lists “questioning” as a synonym for skeptical, and that’s the sense in which I think a believer, and people searching for God, should be a skeptics.

But the word “skeptical” has also come to mean "agnosticism, atheism, disbelief," which the thesaurus also lists as synonyms for the word. That’s not the sense in which I use the word in the title of this blog.

Belief and Doubt

But the other sense in which I use “skeptical” is the implied meaning of “doubtful,” because I believe belief and doubt are two sides of the same coin. Doubt and faith, in my view, are not contradictory.

I believe that most believers, and most non-believers, doubt, the believers about their faith and the non-believers about their lack of faith. It’s part of being human because there are so few certainties in the life.

So, can you be a believer and a skeptic? Of course. And if we’re talking about Christian belief, I think there’s a case for it in the New Testament.

It’s true that, in the gospels, Jesus often praises people’s faith, especially when he has cured them or one of their loved ones. But there is also the case of the apostle Thomas, who after the resurrection, insisted on seeing Jesus’ nail-punctured hands and side before he would believe in the resurrected Jesus.

Christoper Beha
Google Image
According to John’s gospel, when Jesus gave Thomas the opportunity to do just that, Thomas believed. Jesus didn’t rebuke him for his previous lack of faith but only praised those who would come to believe without seeing Jesus – in other words, us.

The gospel stories about Jesus’ arrest and trial show that most of his apostles abandoned him, evidently showing their lack of faith in Jesus and his message. Nonetheless, after the resurrection Jesus showed no animosity nor even annoyance about their lack of faith but was his usual loving self.

Many preachers and religious leaders condemn doubt, or avoid the subject altogether, not wanting to hint that there is any room for doubt in the hearts of believers. I believe mature faith not only tolerates doubt but requires it.

I recently read a story in the New York Times by author Christopher Beha entitled, “Why I Am Not an Atheist.” He briefly tells his story about going from altar boy and believer to atheism and back again to his Catholic faith. The article encourages the embrace of “skeptical belief.”

That, he writes, “does not mean believing things without ‘really’ believing them. It means understanding your beliefs as limited, contingent and fallible, recognizing that they can’t be proved correct, that someone else’s refusal to come around to them does not indicate stupidity or obstinacy or bad faith.

Essential Component

“Similarly, a skeptical believer recognizes doubt as an essential component of belief, rather than its opposite. To a skeptical believer, the great mark of sincerity is the extent to which you attempt to live out your beliefs in your own life despite your own doubts, not the extent to which you silence those doubts or the doubts of others.”

We may have a degree of skepticism about the basics of faith – such as the existence of God and for Christians, the divinity of Jesus – or some of the tenets of one’s religious faith. In my view, they all require living your faith and accepting your doubts.


As Beha puts it, such skepticism is “an expression of the fundamental mystery at the heart of reality and the radical limitations of human understanding.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel of The Little Prince

Image
  Attention all those concerned only with “matters of great consequence:” Is it possible that you’ve become someone you didn’t want to be, having strayed far from the innocence and simplicity of childhood? That’s the main question asked in The Little Prince, which Netflix, the streaming video service, has added to its repertoire of movies and TV shows. Though not a big fan of animated flicks, I was a big fan of the book, The Little Prince, back in the 1970s when it became extremely popular in the U.S. It was first published in French and English in New York in 1943 as a novella by French aristocrat, writer, poet, and pioneering aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupery , who disappeared while piloting a Free French Army plane the following year over the Mediterranean Sea. Nearly Two Million Copies “The novella is the fourth most-translated book in the world and was voted the best book of the 20th century in France,” says Wikipedia. “Translated into more than 250 language...
Read more

The Morality of Nurse Jackie

Image
Google Image Sometimes as I jump rope – an exercise I’ve done most days for at least 35 years - I watch episodes of the series, “Nurse Jackie,” on Netflix. The show stars Edie Falco  in the title character, Jackie Peyton, an emergency-room  nurse at the fictitious All Saints' Hospital in New York City . It suites my purposes because the episodes last about the same amount of time as my exercises. I have mixed feelings about the show, however. I like the fact that it’s a medical show whose main character is a nurse, not a doctor. And there isn’t a nurse alive who's more compassionate toward her patients, and sometimes fellow employees, than Jackie Peyton. But she’s a drug addict, and watching her get through her days at the hospital or at home, and with her husband and daughters, boyfriends, drug suppliers and drug counselors, is like watching a plane tumbling out of the sky on its way to a horrific crash. Only Redeeming Quality? She engages in continual lyi...
Read more

‘Spiritual but Not Religious,’ Revisited

Image
Google Image I’ve expressed several times in these blogs my skepticism about declarations by some of our contemporaries that they are “spiritual but not religious.” Much of the skepticism results from the false dichotomy this entails, as if the spiritual and religious are mutually exclusive. Spirituality, after all, is the whole point of being religious. With the exception of some forms of Buddhism, all the major religions aim to bring people closer to God, who is “spiritual.” St. Paul, among the earliest leaders of Christianity, wrote that he is imparting a teaching “not taught by human wisdom but taught by the spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.” But Daniel Horan, Franciscan priest, theologian and author, wrote in a recent edition of the National Catholic Reporter: “What if our starting point in thinking about what it means to be a person in communion with God, oneself and the world was not reduced to external expressions of institutional belo...
Read more